China vs Latvia: Paper and paperboard — Export quantity, per unit of GDP
China
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
China rank
46th
Latvia rank
44th
Paper and paperboard — Export quantity, per unit of GDP over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.
China ranks 46th and Latvia ranks 44th of 174 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paper and paperboard — export quantity, per unit of gdp, China or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in paper and paperboard — export quantity, per unit of gdp between China and Latvia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for paper and paperboard — export quantity, per unit of gdp?
- China ranks 46th and Latvia ranks 44th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Paper and paperboard — Export quantity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Paper and paperboard — Export quantity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.