Ecuador vs Namibia: Paper and paperboard — Import quantity, per capita
Ecuador
0.0149 t per person
in 2024
Namibia
0.0128 t per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
83rd
Namibia rank
86th
Paper and paperboard — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Namibia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0149 t per person against 0.0128 t per person in Namibia, a difference of 0.0021 t per person.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 83rd and Namibia ranks 86th of 184 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.02 t per person | 0.0087 t per person | 0.0113 t per person | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.0172 t per person | 0.0147 t per person | 0.0024 t per person | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0135 t per person | 0.012 t per person | 0.0015 t per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paper and paperboard — import quantity, per capita, Ecuador or Namibia?
- Ecuador, at 0.0149 t per person against 0.0128 t per person in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in paper and paperboard — import quantity, per capita between Ecuador and Namibia?
- 0.0021 t per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for paper and paperboard — import quantity, per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 83rd and Namibia ranks 86th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Paper and paperboard — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Paper and paperboard — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.