Armenia vs China, mainland: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)
Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) over time
- Armenia
- China, mainland
How they compare
China, mainland currently reports 7.9 % against 7.4 % in Armenia, a difference of 0.5 %.
That makes China, mainland's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 26th and China, mainland ranks 23rd of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and China, mainland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | China, mainland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.14 % | 6.57 % | 2.57 % | Armenia |
| 2010s | 7.76 % | 7.65 % | 0.11 % | Armenia |
| 2020s | 7.4 % | 7.9 % | 0.5 % | China, mainland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year), Armenia or China, mainland?
- China, mainland, at 7.9 % against 7.4 % in Armenia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) between Armenia and China, mainland?
- 0.5 %, with China, mainland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and China, mainland?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Armenia and China, mainland rank globally for percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)?
- Armenia ranks 26th and China, mainland ranks 23rd of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.