Belarus vs Mongolia: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)
Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) over time
- Belarus
- Mongolia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.1 % against 0.1 % in Mongolia, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 140th and Mongolia ranks 140th of 166 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5 % | 0.1 % | 0.4 % | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0.14 % | 0.1 % | 0.04 % | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.1 % | 0.1 % | 0 % | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year), Belarus or Mongolia?
- Belarus, at 0.1 % against 0.1 % in Mongolia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) between Belarus and Mongolia?
- 0 %, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Mongolia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Belarus and Mongolia rank globally for percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)?
- Belarus ranks 140th and Mongolia ranks 140th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.