Central America vs China, Taiwan Province of: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)

Central America
3.3 %
in 2021
China, Taiwan Province of
10.6 %
in 2021
Central America rank
12th
China, Taiwan Province of rank
15th

Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) over time

  • Central America
  • China, Taiwan Province of
246810200020102021

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports 10.6 % against 3.3 % in Central America, a difference of 7.3 %.

That makes China, Taiwan Province of's figure about 3.2 times Central America's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, China, Taiwan Province of has been ahead every year.

Central America ranks 12th and China, Taiwan Province of ranks 15th of 37 groups.

China, Taiwan Province of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central America China, Taiwan Province of Difference Ahead
2000s 2.88 % 10.71 % 7.83 % China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 3.1 % 10.7 % 7.6 % China, Taiwan Province of
2020s 3.3 % 10.65 % 7.35 % China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year), Central America or China, Taiwan Province of?
China, Taiwan Province of, at 10.6 % against 3.3 % in Central America as of 2021.
What is the difference in percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) between Central America and China, Taiwan Province of?
7.3 %, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and China, Taiwan Province of?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Central America and China, Taiwan Province of rank globally for percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)?
Central America ranks 12th and China, Taiwan Province of ranks 15th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central America vs China, Taiwan Province of: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/percent-of-arable-land-equipped-for-irrigation-percent-3-year-average-value/central-america/china-taiwan-province-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/percent-of-arable-land-equipped-for-irrigation-percent-3-year-average-value/central-america/china-taiwan-province-of/">Central America vs China, Taiwan Province of: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 4,821 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.