Central Asia and Southern Asia vs Palestine: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)

Central Asia and Southern Asia
12.5 %
in 2021
Palestine
23.2 %
in 2021
Central Asia and Southern Asia rank
2nd
Palestine rank
4th

Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) over time

  • Central Asia and Southern Asia
  • Palestine
510152025200020102021

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 23.2 % against 12.5 % in Central Asia and Southern Asia, a difference of 10.7 %.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.9 times Central Asia and Southern Asia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Central Asia and Southern Asia ahead.

Central Asia and Southern Asia ranks 2nd and Palestine ranks 4th of 37 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central Asia and Southern Asia averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Asia and Southern Asia Palestine Difference Ahead
2000s 10.89 % 7.18 % 3.71 % Central Asia and Southern Asia
2010s 11.76 % 18.51 % 6.75 % Palestine
2020s 12.5 % 23.2 % 10.7 % Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year), Central Asia and Southern Asia or Palestine?
Palestine, at 23.2 % against 12.5 % in Central Asia and Southern Asia as of 2021.
What is the difference in percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) between Central Asia and Southern Asia and Palestine?
10.7 %, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Southern Asia and Palestine?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Central Asia and Southern Asia and Palestine rank globally for percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)?
Central Asia and Southern Asia ranks 2nd and Palestine ranks 4th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Asia and Southern Asia vs Palestine: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/percent-of-arable-land-equipped-for-irrigation-percent-3-year-average-value/central-asia-and-southern-asia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/percent-of-arable-land-equipped-for-irrigation-percent-3-year-average-value/central-asia-and-southern-asia/west-bank-and-gaza/">Central Asia and Southern Asia vs Palestine: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 4,821 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.