China, Hong Kong SAR vs Jordan: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)
Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Jordan
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 1 % against 1 % in Jordan, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 82nd and Jordan ranks 82nd of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.09 % | 0.96 % | 0.13 % | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | 1 % | 1.09 % | 0.09 % | Jordan |
| 2020s | 1 % | 1 % | 0 % | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year), China, Hong Kong SAR or Jordan?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 1 % against 1 % in Jordan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
- 0 %, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Jordan rank globally for percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 82nd and Jordan ranks 82nd of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.