Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Malta: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1.1 %
in 2021
Malta
11 %
in 2021
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
12th
Malta rank
14th

Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Malta
02.557.51012.5200020102021

How they compare

Malta currently reports 11 % against 1.1 % in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 9.9 %.

That makes Malta's figure about 10.0 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 12th and Malta ranks 14th of 19 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 0.88 % 8.66 % 7.78 % Malta
2010s 0.98 % 11.91 % 10.93 % Malta
2020s 1.1 % 11.6 % 10.5 % Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year), Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Malta?
Malta, at 11 % against 1.1 % in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2021.
What is the difference in percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Malta?
9.9 %, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Malta?
22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Malta rank globally for percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 12th and Malta ranks 14th of 19 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Malta: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/percent-of-arable-land-equipped-for-irrigation-percent-3-year-average-value/least-developed-countries-ldcs/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/percent-of-arable-land-equipped-for-irrigation-percent-3-year-average-value/least-developed-countries-ldcs/malta/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Malta: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year average) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 4,821 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.