Lithuania vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)
Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) over time
- Lithuania
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.1 % against 0.1 % in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 %.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 140th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 140th of 166 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1 % | 0.1 % | 0 % | — |
| 2010s | 0.1 % | 0.1 % | 0 % | — |
| 2020s | 0.1 % | 0.1 % | 0 % | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year), Lithuania or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Lithuania, at 0.1 % against 0.1 % in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2021.
- What is the difference in percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) between Lithuania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0 %, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Lithuania and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)?
- Lithuania ranks 140th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 140th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.