Madagascar vs Saudi Arabia: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)
Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) over time
- Madagascar
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 1.5 % against 1.4 % in Madagascar, a difference of 0.1 %.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 72nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 69th of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.4 % | 0.93 % | 0.47 % | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 1.4 % | 1.44 % | 0.04 % | Saudi Arabia |
| 2020s | 1.4 % | 1.5 % | 0.1 % | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year), Madagascar or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 1.5 % against 1.4 % in Madagascar as of 2021.
- What is the difference in percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) between Madagascar and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.1 %, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Saudi Arabia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Madagascar and Saudi Arabia rank globally for percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)?
- Madagascar ranks 72nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 69th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.