Panama vs Seychelles: Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)
Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) over time
- Panama
- Seychelles
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0.6 % against 0.6 % in Seychelles, a difference of 0 %.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Seychelles has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 102nd and Seychelles ranks 102nd of 166 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4286 % | 0.6 % | 0.1714 % | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 0.46 % | 0.6 % | 0.14 % | Seychelles |
| 2020s | 0.6 % | 0.6 % | 0 % | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year), Panama or Seychelles?
- Panama, at 0.6 % against 0.6 % in Seychelles as of 2021.
- What is the difference in percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year) between Panama and Seychelles?
- 0 %, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Seychelles?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
- How do Panama and Seychelles rank globally for percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year)?
- Panama ranks 102nd and Seychelles ranks 102nd of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percent of arable land equipped for irrigation (percent) (3-year average) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.