Belarus vs Indonesia: Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from
Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from over time
- Belarus
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 5.11 % against 4.57 % in Belarus, a difference of 0.54 %.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 7th and Indonesia ranks 5th of 114 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.31 % | 4.62 % | 1.69 % | Belarus |
| 2020s | 6.29 % | 4.71 % | 1.58 % | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from, Belarus or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 5.11 % against 4.57 % in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from between Belarus and Indonesia?
- 0.54 %, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Indonesia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Indonesia rank globally for percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from?
- Belarus ranks 7th and Indonesia ranks 5th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.