Croatia vs Madagascar: Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from
Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from over time
- Croatia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 3.09 % against 2.99 % in Croatia, a difference of 0.1 %.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 24th and Madagascar ranks 23rd of 114 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.21 % | 1.39 % | 1.82 % | Croatia |
| 2010s | 3.97 % | 1.67 % | 2.3 % | Croatia |
| 2020s | 3.25 % | 1.83 % | 1.41 % | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from, Croatia or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 3.09 % against 2.99 % in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from between Croatia and Madagascar?
- 0.1 %, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Madagascar?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Croatia and Madagascar rank globally for percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from?
- Croatia ranks 24th and Madagascar ranks 23rd of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.