Mongolia vs Serbia: Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from
Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from over time
- Mongolia
- Serbia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 2.03 % against 1.97 % in Serbia, a difference of 0.06 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 53rd of 113 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.6 % | 4.01 % | 1.41 % | Serbia |
| 2010s | 2.79 % | 3.26 % | 0.4638 % | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1.95 % | 2.55 % | 0.592 % | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from, Mongolia or Serbia?
- Mongolia, at 2.03 % against 1.97 % in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from between Mongolia and Serbia?
- 0.06 %, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Serbia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Mongolia and Serbia rank globally for percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from?
- Mongolia ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 53rd of 113 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — National. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.