Kiribati vs Sao Tome and Principe: Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services

Kiribati
79 %
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
78 %
in 2024
Kiribati rank
151st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
153rd

Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services over time

  • Kiribati
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020406080200020122024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 79 % against 78 % in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1 %.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Kiribati ranks 151st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 153rd of 186 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 60.8 % 71.3 % 10.5 % Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 71.5 % 75.2 % 3.7 % Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 78.4 % 77.6 % 0.8 % Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services, Kiribati or Sao Tome and Principe?
Kiribati, at 79 % against 78 % in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services between Kiribati and Sao Tome and Principe?
1 %, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Sao Tome and Principe?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services?
Kiribati ranks 151st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 153rd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Sao Tome and Principe: Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-population-using-at-least-basic-drinking-water-services-percent-value/kiribati/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/percentage-of-population-using-at-least-basic-drinking-water-services-percent-value/kiribati/sao-tome-and-principe/">Kiribati vs Sao Tome and Principe: Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Percentage of population using at least basic drinking water services (percent) — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 5,695 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.