Lithuania vs New Caledonia: Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services
Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services over time
- Lithuania
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 97 % against 97 % in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 %.
Across all 25 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 33rd and New Caledonia ranks 33rd of 133 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74 % | 88.9 % | 14.9 % | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 89.7 % | 94.8 % | 5.1 % | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 96.4 % | 97 % | 0.6 % | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services, Lithuania or New Caledonia?
- Lithuania, at 97 % against 97 % in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services between Lithuania and New Caledonia?
- 0 %, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and New Caledonia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and New Caledonia rank globally for percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services?
- Lithuania ranks 33rd and New Caledonia ranks 33rd of 133 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Percentage of population using safely managed drinking water services (percent) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Food Security Indicators presents the core set of food security indicators. Following the recommendation of experts gathered in the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) Round Table on hunger measurement, hosted at FAO headquarters in September 2011, an initial set of indicators aiming to capture various aspects of food insecurity is presented here. The choice of the indicators has been informed by expert judgement and the availability of data with sufficient coverage to enable comparisons across regions and over time. Many of these indicators are produced and published elsewhere by FAO and other international organizations. They are reported here in a single database with the aim of building a wide food security information system. More indicators will be added to this set as more data will become available. Indicators are classified along the four dimensions of food security -- availability, access, utilization and stability.