Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Permanent crops — Area, annual growth rate

Argentina
0.3835 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand
0.4376 % change on previous year
in 2024
Argentina rank
58th
Australia and New Zealand rank
56th

Permanent crops — Area, annual growth rate over time

  • Argentina
  • Australia and New Zealand
-20-100102030196219932024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0.4376 % change on previous year against 0.3835 % change on previous year in Argentina, a difference of 0.0541 % change on previous year.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 24 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Argentina ranks 58th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 56th of 223 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Australia and New Zealand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6152 % change on previous year 1.04 % change on previous year 0.4289 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
1970s 0.5933 % change on previous year -0.6554 % change on previous year 1.25 % change on previous year Argentina
1980s 0.484 % change on previous year 1.66 % change on previous year 1.17 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
1990s -0.1758 % change on previous year 3.75 % change on previous year 3.92 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
2000s 0.2404 % change on previous year 3.45 % change on previous year 3.21 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
2010s 3.43 % change on previous year -0.2674 % change on previous year 3.7 % change on previous year Argentina
2020s 8.92 % change on previous year 1.79 % change on previous year 7.13 % change on previous year Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher permanent crops — area, annual growth rate, Argentina or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia and New Zealand, at 0.4376 % change on previous year against 0.3835 % change on previous year in Argentina as of 2024.
What is the difference in permanent crops — area, annual growth rate between Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
0.0541 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for permanent crops — area, annual growth rate?
Argentina ranks 58th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 56th of 223 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Permanent crops — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Permanent crops — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-annual-growth-rate/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-annual-growth-rate/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/">Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Permanent crops — Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Permanent crops — Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 14,535 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Permanent crops — Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.