Czechoslovakia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Permanent crops — Area, annual growth rate

Czechoslovakia
4.52 % change on previous year
in 1992
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0.6713 % change on previous year
in 2024
Czechoslovakia rank
12th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
15th

Permanent crops — Area, annual growth rate over time

  • Czechoslovakia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0204060196219932024

How they compare

Czechoslovakia currently reports 4.52 % change on previous year against 0.6713 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 3.85 % change on previous year.

That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 6.7 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.

Czechoslovakia ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th of 223 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 2 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechoslovakia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 3.63 % change on previous year 2.56 % change on previous year 1.07 % change on previous year Czechoslovakia
1970s 1.45 % change on previous year 2.74 % change on previous year 1.29 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s -0.2233 % change on previous year 1.03 % change on previous year 1.25 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 18.56 % change on previous year 17.21 % change on previous year 1.35 % change on previous year Czechoslovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher permanent crops — area, annual growth rate, Czechoslovakia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Czechoslovakia, at 4.52 % change on previous year against 0.6713 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 1992.
What is the difference in permanent crops — area, annual growth rate between Czechoslovakia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
3.85 % change on previous year, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
31 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1992.
How do Czechoslovakia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for permanent crops — area, annual growth rate?
Czechoslovakia ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th of 223 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Permanent crops — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechoslovakia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Permanent crops — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-annual-growth-rate/czechoslovakia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-annual-growth-rate/czechoslovakia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Czechoslovakia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Permanent crops — Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Permanent crops — Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
256 places, 14,535 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Permanent crops — Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.