Which has higher permanent crops — area, per capita, Chile or Dominican Republic?

Dominican Republic, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Chile as of 2024.

What is the difference in permanent crops — area, per capita between Chile and Dominican Republic?

0 1000 ha per person, with Dominican Republic ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Dominican Republic?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Permanent crops — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Dominican Republic: Permanent crops — Area, per capita

Chile

0 1000 ha per person

in 2024

Dominican Republic

0 1000 ha per person

in 2024

Chile rank

65th

Dominican Republic rank

64th

Permanent crops — Area, per capita over time

Chile
Dominican Republic

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Chile, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Chile ranks 65th and Dominican Republic ranks 64th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Dominican Republic in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Dominican Republic	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	Dominican Republic
1970s	0 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	Dominican Republic
1980s	0 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Dominican Republic
1990s	0 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Dominican Republic
2000s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Dominican Republic
2010s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Dominican Republic
2020s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher permanent crops — area, per capita, Chile or Dominican Republic?: Dominican Republic, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in permanent crops — area, per capita between Chile and Dominican Republic?: 0 1000 ha per person, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Dominican Republic?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chile and Dominican Republic rank globally for permanent crops — area, per capita?: Chile ranks 65th and Dominican Republic ranks 64th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Permanent crops — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Dominican Republic: Permanent crops — Area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-per-capita/chile/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-per-capita/chile/dominican-republic/">Chile vs Dominican Republic: Permanent crops — Area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Permanent crops — Area, per capita
Unit: 1000 ha per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 10,290 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 September 2026

Permanent crops — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.