Which has higher permanent crops — area, per capita, Eswatini or Trinidad and Tobago?

Trinidad and Tobago, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Eswatini as of 2024.

What is the difference in permanent crops — area, per capita between Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago?

0 1000 ha per person, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Permanent crops — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Trinidad and Tobago: Permanent crops — Area, per capita

Eswatini

0 1000 ha per person

in 2024

Trinidad and Tobago

0 1000 ha per person

in 2024

Eswatini rank

89th

Trinidad and Tobago rank

88th

Permanent crops — Area, per capita over time

Eswatini
Trinidad and Tobago

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 89th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 88th of 178 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Trinidad and Tobago	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Trinidad and Tobago
1970s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Trinidad and Tobago
1980s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Trinidad and Tobago
1990s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Trinidad and Tobago
2000s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Trinidad and Tobago
2010s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Trinidad and Tobago
2020s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher permanent crops — area, per capita, Eswatini or Trinidad and Tobago?: Trinidad and Tobago, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in permanent crops — area, per capita between Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago?: 0 1000 ha per person, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for permanent crops — area, per capita?: Eswatini ranks 89th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 88th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Permanent crops — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Trinidad and Tobago: Permanent crops — Area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-per-capita/eswatini/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-per-capita/eswatini/trinidad-and-tobago/">Eswatini vs Trinidad and Tobago: Permanent crops — Area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Permanent crops — Area, per capita
Unit: 1000 ha per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 10,290 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 September 2026

Permanent crops — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.