British Virgin Islands vs El Salvador: Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre

British Virgin Islands
0.0067 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0.0074 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
British Virgin Islands rank
37th
El Salvador rank
35th

Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • British Virgin Islands
  • El Salvador
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.0074 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0067 1000 ha per square kilometre in British Virgin Islands, a difference of 0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times British Virgin Islands's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

British Virgin Islands ranks 37th and El Salvador ranks 35th of 178 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade British Virgin Islands El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0067 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.008 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 0.0067 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0098 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0031 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 0.0067 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0122 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0056 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 0.0067 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0125 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0059 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 0.0067 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0117 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.005 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0067 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0089 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.0067 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0076 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.001 1000 ha per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher permanent crops — area, per square kilometre, British Virgin Islands or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 0.0074 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0067 1000 ha per square kilometre in British Virgin Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in permanent crops — area, per square kilometre between British Virgin Islands and El Salvador?
0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do British Virgin Islands and El Salvador rank globally for permanent crops — area, per square kilometre?
British Virgin Islands ranks 37th and El Salvador ranks 35th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

British Virgin Islands vs El Salvador: Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-per-square-kilometre/british-virgin-islands/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-per-square-kilometre/british-virgin-islands/el-salvador/">British Virgin Islands vs El Salvador: Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 10,140 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Permanent crops — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.