What is the difference in permanent crops — area, per square kilometre between Chile and Gabon?

0 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Gabon?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Gabon: Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre

Chile

0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre

in 2023

Gabon

0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

117th

Gabon rank

118th

Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre over time

Chile
Gabon

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre in Gabon, a difference of 0 1000 ha per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 117th and Gabon ranks 118th of 178 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Gabon in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Gabon	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre	0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre	0 1000 ha per square kilometre	Gabon
1970s	0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre	0.0005 1000 ha per square kilometre	0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre	Gabon
1980s	0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre	0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre	0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre	Gabon
1990s	0.0004 1000 ha per square kilometre	0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre	0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre	Gabon
2000s	0.0006 1000 ha per square kilometre	0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre	0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre	Gabon
2010s	0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre	0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre	0 1000 ha per square kilometre	Chile
2020s	0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre	0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre	0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher permanent crops — area, per square kilometre, Chile or Gabon?: Chile, at 0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0007 1000 ha per square kilometre in Gabon as of 2023.
What is the difference in permanent crops — area, per square kilometre between Chile and Gabon?: 0 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Gabon?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Gabon rank globally for permanent crops — area, per square kilometre?: Chile ranks 117th and Gabon ranks 118th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Gabon: Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-per-square-kilometre/chile/gabon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-per-square-kilometre/chile/gabon/">Chile vs Gabon: Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 ha per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 10,140 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 13 September 2026

Permanent crops — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.