New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre

New Caledonia
0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
157th
Zimbabwe rank
154th

Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zimbabwe
00000196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 157th and Zimbabwe ranks 154th of 178 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre 0 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.0004 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.0004 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.0003 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0002 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher permanent crops — area, per square kilometre, New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre against 0.0001 1000 ha per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in permanent crops — area, per square kilometre between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
0 1000 ha per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for permanent crops — area, per square kilometre?
New Caledonia ranks 157th and Zimbabwe ranks 154th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/">New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Permanent crops — Area, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 ha per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
180 places, 10,140 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Permanent crops — Area divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.