Australia and New Zealand vs Chile: Permanent crops — Area

Australia and New Zealand
459 1000 ha
in 2024
Chile
499 1000 ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
52nd
Chile rank
51st

Permanent crops — Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Chile
0200400600196119922024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 499 1000 ha against 459 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 40 1000 ha.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 52nd and Chile ranks 51st of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 206.05 1000 ha 197.33 1000 ha 8.71 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
1970s 204.34 1000 ha 201.4 1000 ha 2.94 1000 ha Australia and New Zealand
1980s 216.62 1000 ha 228.9 1000 ha 12.28 1000 ha Chile
1990s 254.6 1000 ha 288.43 1000 ha 33.83 1000 ha Chile
2000s 398.48 1000 ha 414.8 1000 ha 16.32 1000 ha Chile
2010s 417.71 1000 ha 506.34 1000 ha 88.64 1000 ha Chile
2020s 451.6 1000 ha 527.22 1000 ha 75.62 1000 ha Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher permanent crops — area, Australia and New Zealand or Chile?
Chile, at 499 1000 ha against 459 1000 ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in permanent crops — area between Australia and New Zealand and Chile?
40 1000 ha, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Chile?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Chile rank globally for permanent crops — area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 52nd and Chile ranks 51st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Permanent crops — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Chile: Permanent crops — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area/australia-and-new-zealand/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-crops-area/australia-and-new-zealand/chile/">Australia and New Zealand vs Chile: Permanent crops — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Permanent crops — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
256 places, 14,814 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.