What is the difference in permanent meadows and pastures — area, per capita between Barbados and French Polynesia?

0 1000 ha per person, with Barbados ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and French Polynesia?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Permanent meadows and pastures — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs French Polynesia: Permanent meadows and pastures — Area, per capita

Barbados

0 1000 ha per person

in 2024

French Polynesia

0 1000 ha per person

in 2024

Barbados rank

161st

French Polynesia rank

164th

Permanent meadows and pastures — Area, per capita over time

Barbados
French Polynesia

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in French Polynesia, a difference of 0 1000 ha per person.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.3 times French Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

Barbados ranks 161st and French Polynesia ranks 164th of 176 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	French Polynesia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 ha per person	0.0002 1000 ha per person	0.0002 1000 ha per person	French Polynesia
1970s	0 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	French Polynesia
1980s	0 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	French Polynesia
1990s	0 1000 ha per person	0.0001 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	French Polynesia
2000s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	French Polynesia
2010s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	French Polynesia
2020s	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	0 1000 ha per person	French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher permanent meadows and pastures — area, per capita, Barbados or French Polynesia?: Barbados, at 0 1000 ha per person against 0 1000 ha per person in French Polynesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in permanent meadows and pastures — area, per capita between Barbados and French Polynesia?: 0 1000 ha per person, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and French Polynesia?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Barbados and French Polynesia rank globally for permanent meadows and pastures — area, per capita?: Barbados ranks 161st and French Polynesia ranks 164th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Permanent meadows and pastures — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs French Polynesia: Permanent meadows and pastures — Area, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-meadows-and-pastures-area-per-capita/barbados/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-meadows-and-pastures-area-per-capita/barbados/french-polynesia/">Barbados vs French Polynesia: Permanent meadows and pastures — Area, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Permanent meadows and pastures — Area, per capita
Unit: 1000 ha per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 179 places, 10,397 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 13 September 2026

Permanent meadows and pastures — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.