Cayman Islands vs Pacific Islands Trust Territory: Permanent meadows and pastures — Area

Cayman Islands
2 1000 ha
in 2024
Pacific Islands Trust Territory
2.96 1000 ha
in 1990
Cayman Islands rank
184th
Pacific Islands Trust Territory rank
181st

Permanent meadows and pastures — Area over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Pacific Islands Trust Territory
05101520196119922024

How they compare

Pacific Islands Trust Territory currently reports 2.96 1000 ha against 2 1000 ha in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.96 1000 ha.

That makes Pacific Islands Trust Territory's figure about 1.5 times Cayman Islands's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Pacific Islands Trust Territory has been ahead every year.

Cayman Islands ranks 184th and Pacific Islands Trust Territory ranks 181st of 204 countries.

Pacific Islands Trust Territory has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Pacific Islands Trust Territory Difference Ahead
1960s 2 1000 ha 18.22 1000 ha 16.22 1000 ha Pacific Islands Trust Territory
1970s 2 1000 ha 16 1000 ha 14 1000 ha Pacific Islands Trust Territory
1980s 2 1000 ha 12.1 1000 ha 10.1 1000 ha Pacific Islands Trust Territory
1990s 2 1000 ha 2.96 1000 ha 0.96 1000 ha Pacific Islands Trust Territory

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher permanent meadows and pastures — area, Cayman Islands or Pacific Islands Trust Territory?
Pacific Islands Trust Territory, at 2.96 1000 ha against 2 1000 ha in Cayman Islands as of 1990.
What is the difference in permanent meadows and pastures — area between Cayman Islands and Pacific Islands Trust Territory?
0.96 1000 ha, with Pacific Islands Trust Territory ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Pacific Islands Trust Territory?
30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Cayman Islands and Pacific Islands Trust Territory rank globally for permanent meadows and pastures — area?
Cayman Islands ranks 184th and Pacific Islands Trust Territory ranks 181st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Permanent meadows and pastures — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Pacific Islands Trust Territory: Permanent meadows and pastures — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-meadows-and-pastures-area/cayman-islands/pacific-islands-trust-territory/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-meadows-and-pastures-area/cayman-islands/pacific-islands-trust-territory/">Cayman Islands vs Pacific Islands Trust Territory: Permanent meadows and pastures — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Permanent meadows and pastures — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
256 places, 14,952 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.