China, mainland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Permanent meadows and pastures — Area

China, mainland
263,215 1000 ha
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
23,977 1000 ha
in 2024
China, mainland rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
6th

Permanent meadows and pastures — Area over time

  • China, mainland
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922024

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 263,215 1000 ha against 23,977 1000 ha in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 239,238 1000 ha.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 11.0 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, China, mainland has been ahead every year.

China, mainland ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 204 countries.

China, mainland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 319,080 1000 ha 20,000 1000 ha 299,080 1000 ha China, mainland
1970s 319,011 1000 ha 20,900 1000 ha 298,111 1000 ha China, mainland
1980s 314,608 1000 ha 21,900 1000 ha 292,708 1000 ha China, mainland
1990s 307,727 1000 ha 22,804 1000 ha 284,924 1000 ha China, mainland
2000s 298,966 1000 ha 23,996 1000 ha 274,970 1000 ha China, mainland
2010s 276,093 1000 ha 23,985 1000 ha 252,108 1000 ha China, mainland
2020s 263,658 1000 ha 23,978 1000 ha 239,680 1000 ha China, mainland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher permanent meadows and pastures — area, China, mainland or United Republic of Tanzania?
China, mainland, at 263,215 1000 ha against 23,977 1000 ha in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in permanent meadows and pastures — area between China, mainland and United Republic of Tanzania?
239,238 1000 ha, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and United Republic of Tanzania?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China, mainland and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for permanent meadows and pastures — area?
China, mainland ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 6th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Permanent meadows and pastures — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Permanent meadows and pastures — Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-meadows-and-pastures-area/china-mainland/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-meadows-and-pastures-area/china-mainland/united-republic-of-tanzania/">China, mainland vs United Republic of Tanzania: Permanent meadows and pastures — Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Permanent meadows and pastures — Area
Unit
1000 ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
256 places, 14,952 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.