Australia and New Zealand vs Cabo Verde: Permanent meadows and pastures — Share in Land area

Australia and New Zealand
42.88 %
in 2024
Cabo Verde
6.2 %
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
29th
Cabo Verde rank
30th

Permanent meadows and pastures — Share in Land area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Cabo Verde
0204060196119922024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 42.88 % against 6.2 % in Cabo Verde, a difference of 36.68 %.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 6.9 times Cabo Verde's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 29th and Cabo Verde ranks 30th of 204 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Cabo Verde Difference Ahead
1960s 60.9 % 6.2 % 54.7 % Australia and New Zealand
1970s 62.24 % 6.2 % 56.04 % Australia and New Zealand
1980s 59.94 % 6.2 % 53.74 % Australia and New Zealand
1990s 57.51 % 6.2 % 51.31 % Australia and New Zealand
2000s 50.95 % 6.2 % 44.75 % Australia and New Zealand
2010s 43.82 % 6.2 % 37.62 % Australia and New Zealand
2020s 42.71 % 6.2 % 36.51 % Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher permanent meadows and pastures — share in land area, Australia and New Zealand or Cabo Verde?
Australia and New Zealand, at 42.88 % against 6.2 % in Cabo Verde as of 2024.
What is the difference in permanent meadows and pastures — share in land area between Australia and New Zealand and Cabo Verde?
36.68 %, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Cabo Verde?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Cabo Verde rank globally for permanent meadows and pastures — share in land area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 29th and Cabo Verde ranks 30th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Permanent meadows and pastures — Share in Land area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Cabo Verde: Permanent meadows and pastures — Share in Land area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-meadows-and-pastures-share-in-land-area/australia-and-new-zealand/cabo-verde-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/permanent-meadows-and-pastures-share-in-land-area/australia-and-new-zealand/cabo-verde-2/">Australia and New Zealand vs Cabo Verde: Permanent meadows and pastures — Share in Land area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Permanent meadows and pastures — Share in Land area
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
256 places, 14,952 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Land Use domain contains data on twenty-one land use categories and twenty-three categories of irrigation and agricultural practices. Data are available yearly and by country, regional and global levels. The domain includes Land Use Indicators providing information on the percentage share of agricultural and forest land, and their sub-components, including irrigated areas and areas under organic agriculture, within a country land use matrix. Data are available at country, regional and global level, for the following elements: (in percentage) i) Share in Land area; ii) Share in Agricultural land, iii) Share in Cropland; and iv) Share in Forest land; (in ha/pc) v) Area per capita.