Dominican Republic vs Ecuador: Phosphate rock — Agricultural Use
Phosphate rock — Agricultural Use over time
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 15,420 t against 1,206 t in Ecuador, a difference of 14,214 t.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 12.8 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Ecuador ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 3rd and Ecuador ranks 6th of 24 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11,630 t | 872.4 t | 10,758 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 11,812 t | 834.5 t | 10,978 t | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — agricultural use, Dominican Republic or Ecuador?
- Dominican Republic, at 15,420 t against 1,206 t in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — agricultural use between Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 14,214 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Ecuador rank globally for phosphate rock — agricultural use?
- Dominican Republic ranks 3rd and Ecuador ranks 6th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf