Iceland vs Mauritius: Phosphate rock — Agricultural Use

Iceland
0 t
in 2023
Mauritius
0 t
in 2024
Iceland rank
12th
Mauritius rank
12th

Phosphate rock — Agricultural Use over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritius
0510152025201320182024

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Mauritius, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Mauritius ahead.

Iceland ranks 12th and Mauritius ranks 12th of 27 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritius Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 7.4 t 7.4 t Mauritius
2020s 0.25 t 2.5 t 2.25 t Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher phosphate rock — agricultural use, Iceland or Mauritius?
Iceland, at 0 t against 0 t in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in phosphate rock — agricultural use between Iceland and Mauritius?
0 t, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritius?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mauritius rank globally for phosphate rock — agricultural use?
Iceland ranks 12th and Mauritius ranks 12th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Phosphate rock — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
27 places, 248 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf