Iceland vs Slovakia: Phosphate rock — Agricultural Use

Iceland
0 t
in 2023
Slovakia
0 t
in 2024
Iceland rank
12th
Slovakia rank
12th

Phosphate rock — Agricultural Use over time

  • Iceland
  • Slovakia
050100150201520192024

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Slovakia, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Slovakia ahead.

Iceland ranks 12th and Slovakia ranks 12th of 27 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Slovakia Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 47.67 t 47.67 t Slovakia
2020s 0.3333 t 0 t 0.3333 t Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher phosphate rock — agricultural use, Iceland or Slovakia?
Iceland, at 0 t against 0 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
What is the difference in phosphate rock — agricultural use between Iceland and Slovakia?
0 t, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Slovakia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Slovakia rank globally for phosphate rock — agricultural use?
Iceland ranks 12th and Slovakia ranks 12th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Phosphate rock — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
27 places, 248 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf