China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kenya: Phosphate rock — Export quantity
Phosphate rock — Export quantity over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 37 t against 26.48 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 10.52 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.4 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kenya ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 63rd and Kenya ranks 61st of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Kenya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.09 t | 203.78 t | 200.69 t | Kenya |
| 2010s | 48.15 t | 26.02 t | 22.13 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | 26.48 t | 52 t | 25.52 t | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — export quantity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 37 t against 26.48 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — export quantity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Kenya?
- 10.52 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Kenya?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Kenya rank globally for phosphate rock — export quantity?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 63rd and Kenya ranks 61st of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf