China, Hong Kong SAR vs Uganda: Phosphate rock — Export quantity
Phosphate rock — Export quantity over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Uganda
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 26.48 t against 20.3 t in Uganda, a difference of 6.18 t.
That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.3 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uganda ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 63rd and Uganda ranks 66th of 98 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.14 t | 94.26 t | 91.12 t | Uganda |
| 2010s | 34.2 t | 157 t | 122.8 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — export quantity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Uganda?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 26.48 t against 20.3 t in Uganda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — export quantity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Uganda?
- 6.18 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2012.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Uganda rank globally for phosphate rock — export quantity?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 63rd and Uganda ranks 66th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf