Denmark vs Ecuador: Phosphate rock — Export quantity

Denmark
352.29 t
in 2024
Ecuador
351 t
in 2024
Denmark rank
44th
Ecuador rank
45th

Phosphate rock — Export quantity over time

  • Denmark
  • Ecuador
05001.0k1.5k2.0k200220132024

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 352.29 t against 351 t in Ecuador, a difference of 1.29 t.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 44th and Ecuador ranks 45th of 98 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Ecuador Difference Ahead
2010s 265.86 t 7.41 t 258.45 t Denmark
2020s 361.12 t 175.69 t 185.44 t Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher phosphate rock — export quantity, Denmark or Ecuador?
Denmark, at 352.29 t against 351 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in phosphate rock — export quantity between Denmark and Ecuador?
1.29 t, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Ecuador?
6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Denmark and Ecuador rank globally for phosphate rock — export quantity?
Denmark ranks 44th and Ecuador ranks 45th of 98 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Phosphate rock — Export quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
129 places, 2,297 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf