Namibia vs Republic of Korea: Phosphate rock — Export quantity
Phosphate rock — Export quantity over time
- Namibia
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 68 t against 40.76 t in Republic of Korea, a difference of 27.24 t.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.7 times Republic of Korea's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 51st and Republic of Korea ranks 53rd of 92 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Korea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.91 t | 23.21 t | 19.7 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 4.63 t | 249.04 t | 244.4 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2020s | 34.01 t | 40.89 t | 6.89 t | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — export quantity, Namibia or Republic of Korea?
- Namibia, at 68 t against 40.76 t in Republic of Korea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — export quantity between Namibia and Republic of Korea?
- 27.24 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Republic of Korea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Republic of Korea rank globally for phosphate rock — export quantity?
- Namibia ranks 51st and Republic of Korea ranks 53rd of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf