Australia vs Kazakhstan: Phosphate rock — Export value
Phosphate rock — Export value over time
- Australia
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 85,412 1000 USD against 24,741 1000 USD in Australia, a difference of 60,671 1000 USD.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 3.5 times Australia's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 13th and Kazakhstan ranks 11th of 98 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 137 1000 USD | 7,802 1000 USD | 7,665 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 53.02 1000 USD | 22,599 1000 USD | 22,546 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 8,319 1000 USD | 82,583 1000 USD | 74,264 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — export value, Australia or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 85,412 1000 USD against 24,741 1000 USD in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — export value between Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 60,671 1000 USD, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for phosphate rock — export value?
- Australia ranks 13th and Kazakhstan ranks 11th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf