Costa Rica vs Luxembourg: Phosphate rock — Export value
Phosphate rock — Export value over time
- Costa Rica
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 367.1 1000 USD against 284.38 1000 USD in Costa Rica, a difference of 82.72 1000 USD.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.3 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 38th and Luxembourg ranks 36th of 98 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.35 1000 USD | 0.39 1000 USD | 13.96 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 153.2 1000 USD | 159.96 1000 USD | 6.75 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — export value, Costa Rica or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 367.1 1000 USD against 284.38 1000 USD in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — export value between Costa Rica and Luxembourg?
- 82.72 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Luxembourg?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Luxembourg rank globally for phosphate rock — export value?
- Costa Rica ranks 38th and Luxembourg ranks 36th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf