Ecuador vs Luxembourg: Phosphate rock — Export value
Phosphate rock — Export value over time
- Ecuador
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 367.1 1000 USD against 278.01 1000 USD in Ecuador, a difference of 89.09 1000 USD.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.3 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 39th and Luxembourg ranks 36th of 98 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.96 1000 USD | 0.4925 1000 USD | 10.47 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 279.67 1000 USD | 239.14 1000 USD | 40.53 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — export value, Ecuador or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 367.1 1000 USD against 278.01 1000 USD in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — export value between Ecuador and Luxembourg?
- 89.09 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Luxembourg?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Luxembourg rank globally for phosphate rock — export value?
- Ecuador ranks 39th and Luxembourg ranks 36th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf