Kazakhstan vs Senegal: Phosphate rock — Export value
Phosphate rock — Export value over time
- Kazakhstan
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 91,156 1000 USD against 85,412 1000 USD in Kazakhstan, a difference of 5,744 1000 USD.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Senegal ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 11th and Senegal ranks 9th of 98 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Senegal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,802 1000 USD | 6,612 1000 USD | 1,191 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 26,748 1000 USD | 27,424 1000 USD | 675.5 1000 USD | Senegal |
| 2020s | 82,583 1000 USD | 61,930 1000 USD | 20,653 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — export value, Kazakhstan or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 91,156 1000 USD against 85,412 1000 USD in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — export value between Kazakhstan and Senegal?
- 5,744 1000 USD, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Senegal?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Senegal rank globally for phosphate rock — export value?
- Kazakhstan ranks 11th and Senegal ranks 9th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf