Luxembourg vs Zimbabwe: Phosphate rock — Export value
Phosphate rock — Export value over time
- Luxembourg
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 556.98 1000 USD against 367.1 1000 USD in Luxembourg, a difference of 189.88 1000 USD.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 92 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.36 1000 USD | 60.71 1000 USD | 60.35 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.458 1000 USD | 197.32 1000 USD | 196.87 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1.6 1000 USD | 556.98 1000 USD | 555.38 1000 USD | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — export value, Luxembourg or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 556.98 1000 USD against 367.1 1000 USD in Luxembourg as of 2020.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — export value between Luxembourg and Zimbabwe?
- 189.88 1000 USD, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Luxembourg and Zimbabwe rank globally for phosphate rock — export value?
- Luxembourg ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf