Sri Lanka vs Viet Nam: Phosphate rock — Export value
Phosphate rock — Export value over time
- Sri Lanka
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 9,334 1000 USD against 2,797 1000 USD in Sri Lanka, a difference of 6,537 1000 USD.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 3.3 times Sri Lanka's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 23rd and Viet Nam ranks 20th of 98 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.59 1000 USD | 4,249 1000 USD | 4,249 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 0.795 1000 USD | 14,503 1000 USD | 14,503 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 0.02 1000 USD | 6,422 1000 USD | 6,422 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — export value, Sri Lanka or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 9,334 1000 USD against 2,797 1000 USD in Sri Lanka as of 2021.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — export value between Sri Lanka and Viet Nam?
- 6,537 1000 USD, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Viet Nam?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
- How do Sri Lanka and Viet Nam rank globally for phosphate rock — export value?
- Sri Lanka ranks 23rd and Viet Nam ranks 20th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf