Bangladesh vs Turkmenistan: Phosphate rock — Import quantity
Phosphate rock — Import quantity over time
- Bangladesh
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 88,772 t against 54,940 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 33,832 t.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.6 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 34th and Turkmenistan ranks 32nd of 182 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89,229 t | 42,188 t | 47,041 t | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 84,466 t | 72,748 t | 11,718 t | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 103,443 t | 68,557 t | 34,885 t | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import quantity, Bangladesh or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 88,772 t against 54,940 t in Bangladesh as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import quantity between Bangladesh and Turkmenistan?
- 33,832 t, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Turkmenistan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Turkmenistan rank globally for phosphate rock — import quantity?
- Bangladesh ranks 34th and Turkmenistan ranks 32nd of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf