Belgium vs Russian Federation: Phosphate rock — Import quantity
Phosphate rock — Import quantity over time
- Belgium
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 809,645 t against 589,337 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 220,308 t.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.4 times Russian Federation's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 7th and Russian Federation ranks 9th of 182 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.42 million t | 60,518 t | 1.36 million t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 921,330 t | 252,236 t | 669,094 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 797,715 t | 591,973 t | 205,742 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import quantity, Belgium or Russian Federation?
- Belgium, at 809,645 t against 589,337 t in Russian Federation as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import quantity between Belgium and Russian Federation?
- 220,308 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Russian Federation?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Russian Federation rank globally for phosphate rock — import quantity?
- Belgium ranks 7th and Russian Federation ranks 9th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf