Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zambia: Phosphate rock — Import quantity
Phosphate rock — Import quantity over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Zambia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1.08 t against 1.06 t in Zambia, a difference of 0.02 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 127th and Zambia ranks 128th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.87 t | 44.91 t | 47.96 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 10.65 t | 22.05 t | 11.4 t | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0.025 t | 0.555 t | 0.53 t | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import quantity, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Zambia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1.08 t against 1.06 t in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import quantity between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia?
- 0.02 t, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zambia rank globally for phosphate rock — import quantity?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 127th and Zambia ranks 128th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf