Burkina Faso vs Costa Rica: Phosphate rock — Import quantity
Phosphate rock — Import quantity over time
- Burkina Faso
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 60 t against 35.72 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 24.28 t.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.7 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 87th and Costa Rica ranks 90th of 170 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 254.78 t | 0.8967 t | 253.88 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 0.89 t | 230.34 t | 229.45 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 45.5 t | 196.27 t | 150.77 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import quantity, Burkina Faso or Costa Rica?
- Burkina Faso, at 60 t against 35.72 t in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import quantity between Burkina Faso and Costa Rica?
- 24.28 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Costa Rica?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Costa Rica rank globally for phosphate rock — import quantity?
- Burkina Faso ranks 87th and Costa Rica ranks 90th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf