Denmark vs Papua New Guinea: Phosphate rock — Import quantity
Phosphate rock — Import quantity over time
- Denmark
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 357.86 t against 263.48 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 94.38 t.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.4 times Papua New Guinea's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 63rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 64th of 170 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7,936 t | 1.96 t | 7,934 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 1,080 t | 60.33 t | 1,020 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 3,172 t | 135.17 t | 3,036 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import quantity, Denmark or Papua New Guinea?
- Denmark, at 357.86 t against 263.48 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import quantity between Denmark and Papua New Guinea?
- 94.38 t, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Papua New Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Denmark and Papua New Guinea rank globally for phosphate rock — import quantity?
- Denmark ranks 63rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 64th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf