Dominican Republic vs Rwanda: Phosphate rock — Import quantity
Phosphate rock — Import quantity over time
- Dominican Republic
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 2.65 t against 1.82 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.83 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.5 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 129th and Rwanda ranks 126th of 182 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.12 t | 15.95 t | 4.83 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 6.11 t | 58.81 t | 52.7 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 25.64 t | 2.65 t | 22.99 t | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import quantity, Dominican Republic or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 2.65 t against 1.82 t in Dominican Republic as of 2021.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import quantity between Dominican Republic and Rwanda?
- 0.83 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Rwanda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Rwanda rank globally for phosphate rock — import quantity?
- Dominican Republic ranks 129th and Rwanda ranks 126th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf