Georgia vs Mali: Phosphate rock — Import quantity

Georgia
1,045 t
in 2024
Mali
1,000 t
in 2021
Georgia rank
58th
Mali rank
59th

Phosphate rock — Import quantity over time

  • Georgia
  • Mali
02.0k4.0k6.0k200320132024

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 1,045 t against 1,000 t in Mali, a difference of 45 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 58th and Mali ranks 59th of 182 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Mali Difference Ahead
2000s 65 t 38.85 t 26.15 t Georgia
2010s 0.145 t 2,619 t 2,619 t Mali
2020s 371.46 t 1,000 t 628.54 t Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher phosphate rock — import quantity, Georgia or Mali?
Georgia, at 1,045 t against 1,000 t in Mali as of 2024.
What is the difference in phosphate rock — import quantity between Georgia and Mali?
45 t, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mali?
5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
How do Georgia and Mali rank globally for phosphate rock — import quantity?
Georgia ranks 58th and Mali ranks 59th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Phosphate rock — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
214 places, 3,834 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf