Lithuania vs Viet Nam: Phosphate rock — Import quantity
Phosphate rock — Import quantity over time
- Lithuania
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 832,490 t against 29,357 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 803,133 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 28.4 times Viet Nam's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 170 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.13 million t | 39,660 t | 1.09 million t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 1.31 million t | 5,620 t | 1.31 million t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 1.10 million t | 13,364 t | 1.09 million t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import quantity, Lithuania or Viet Nam?
- Lithuania, at 832,490 t against 29,357 t in Viet Nam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import quantity between Lithuania and Viet Nam?
- 803,133 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Viet Nam?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Lithuania and Viet Nam rank globally for phosphate rock — import quantity?
- Lithuania ranks 5th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf