Papua New Guinea vs Slovakia: Phosphate rock — Import quantity
Phosphate rock — Import quantity over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Slovakia
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 263.48 t against 246.9 t in Slovakia, a difference of 16.58 t.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Slovakia ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 64th and Slovakia ranks 66th of 170 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.96 t | 2,299 t | 2,297 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 60.33 t | 756.92 t | 696.6 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 135.17 t | 254.44 t | 119.27 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher phosphate rock — import quantity, Papua New Guinea or Slovakia?
- Papua New Guinea, at 263.48 t against 246.9 t in Slovakia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in phosphate rock — import quantity between Papua New Guinea and Slovakia?
- 16.58 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Slovakia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Slovakia rank globally for phosphate rock — import quantity?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 64th and Slovakia ranks 66th of 170 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Phosphate rock — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf